Chennai: The Kongu People’s Front has come out in support of actor Surya in the Jaibhim controversy. Arumugam, the chief co-ordinator of the Kongu People’s Front, has raised 9 questions for Anbumani, the Pamaka youth leader who raised 9 questions for actor Surya.
Arumugam, the chief co-ordinator of the Kongu People’s Front, has issued a statement in this regard: It is customary for some fictional scenes to be filmed in a screenplay format when filming a real event! Controversy was raised by the Bamaga as the Vanni were insulted by the photo of Kalasa Kundam in the scene that comes a few seconds later in the movie “Jaybhim” which was shown like that!
The Kalasakundam scene has also changed following this protest! Following that, the name Kurumurthy refers to a person from the Vanniyar community and the voice of protest is raised by Anbumani! The director sets the scenes for the film. Without questioning the director Anbumani, it is the politics of advertising selfishness to provoke people by targeting only actor Surya!
Many changes in the true story
The film shows the dark community as the victim community in the story and the victim in the actual incident is the minority community. Also the names of some of the characters and the names of the villages are shown in the film to match the real event and some of the names are fictional. But, there are some questions for Anbumani who incites violence to the Vanni as they have insulted us with the single Kalasakundam scene (even after it was changed).
The name of the farmer is Ramadas
When the event was held to spread the name of the Vellalar caste, which has a long history of Tamil land, to the Pallar community, Vellalar all came together in a team and opposed it. But Dr. Ramdas passed the resolution at the Pamaka Political Conference in 1994 that the name of Vellalar should be passed on to the Pallar community in Paramakudi without understanding the sentiment of Valalar.
False Silence and Chief Qualification
Moreover, in 2012 he made the same demand to the Tamil Nadu government and hurt the hearts of millions of farmers. After that, Pallar issued a statement and shouted that he was a farmer. Didn’t Anbumani and Ramadas hear the voice of the farming community then? Is it right to wait for the fake silence without condemning what happened to his party and father at the event of such a tumultuous love affair for a movie and pretend to be good today? Is this the qualification to become the Chief Minister?
The dream of the unfulfilled chief
Does this act show similarity to Anbumani who questions Surya that Bamaka does not support caste and religious conflict? Anbumani wants to pursue his politics as the only chief minister who will continue to create caste conflict in the Tamil community, act contrary to reality and clash with other communities. It never works
Surya belongs to the majority community
It is because of Anbumani’s short-lived action that Ramadas’ Bamaka, who waged a huge reservation struggle, has today shrunk to a party that fights only for meager film screenings and against screen actors! The Vanniyar community by you is only going backwards and not forwards! Don’t you know that Anbumani Ramadoss, who intimidates the caste system with a name that puts Surya, who belongs to the majority community, in the screenplay in a film and shows the kalasa kundam scene, supported our Vellalar community name when it was cast for another community? Doesn’t that feel like a betrayal of the farming community? Thus questioned Arumugam, the chief co-ordinator of the Kongu People’s Front.
