Numerous pieces of evidence have been documented against movie producer Leena Manimekalai across India, remembering Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, and Uttar Pradesh, for the banner of her film Goddess Kali. Leena has been accused of advancing hatred between various networks on grounds of religion, shocking strict sentiments purposefully and deliberately affronted with the expectation of inciting a break in harmony.
The FIRs were recorded after the producer tweeted the banner of her narrative, named “Kaali,” in which the goddess has been shown smoking a cigarette and holding an LGBTQ banner. Nonetheless, getting denounced to confront the law is a difficult errand when the individual is abroad. Lawful specialists are of the view that in such cases, finishing the test becomes troublesome.
As an issue of regulation, the police in India are enabled to examine an individual outside the domain of India for a wrongdoing that has been carried out on Indian soil. Be that as it may, the strategy included is for quite some time, and I see no expectation for the police in India to have the option to examine Leena in a nation like Canada.
Regardless, the state government and the union government ought to initially agree that examining Leena on unfamiliar soil is fundamental. On the off chance that such an agreement is reached, they would need to demand from the experts in Canada to allow our police to stand up to Leena on their turf. Canadian courts treat the freedom of a person seriously, and they could essentially laugh at the allegations levelled against the producer. Truth be told, if the Indian government could transform into a fool for the world, would it be a good idea for it to seek after Leena on Canadian soil? The FIR against Leena is just fit for homegrown utilization.
Police attempt to explore a case and record a charge sheet if an offence is made out. On the off chance that the person blamed is an Indian resident, guardianship might be looked for and gotten through a few cycles, including the retraction of a visa. If the person accused is not a resident, removal may be sought; however, a nation rarely removes its resident for preliminary in an unfamiliar country.
