Chennai: SBI Strong condemnation is mounting for the social injustice inflicted on the cut-off marks for clerk posts held by the bank. Allocating the lowest cut-off marks only to the upper caste poor is against social justice. Have strongly condemned.
In this connection Panruti The. Velmurugan MLA The statement issued by the State Bank of India is shocking as the reservation rules continue to be violated in the exams. The Right to Life Party of Tamil Nadu strongly condemns such a move by the State Bank against social justice.
The cut-off marks for the State Bank of India clerk posts have been released recently. Of that, 10 per cent is reserved for the upper caste poor in these cut-off scores. While 10 per cent reservation has already been made for the upper caste poor for the last 2 years and cut-off marks have been declared, this year the same has been given for the 10 per cent reservation for the upper caste poor.
Violation of reservation protocols
That is 61.75 per cent for the general category, 61.75 per cent for the downtrodden, 61.75 per cent for the backward poor, 57.25 per cent for the tribals and 47.75 per cent for the upper caste poor. According to such statistics released by the State Bank of India, it seems that the bank has violated the reservation procedures. In particular, for the general category, the underprivileged and the backward poor, in what way is it fair to set a cut-off score of only one percentage point ?. The cut-off score is lower for the upper caste poor than that. That is, only 47.75 percent.
No conscience
Considering whether these cut-off details are in line with social realities, it is natural to wonder whether the State Bank of India reservation norms are being followed properly. Also, the general list includes the reservation category. Will they be on the public list when they get above the general list cut-off marks ?. Will that norm be followed ?. Cut-off scores are lower in percentage for the upper caste poor than for the tribal. Is this the mindset of the State Bank of India? Does the State Bank of India believe that the livelihood of the tribal people living in the hill villages is better than that of the upper caste poor living in rural and urban areas?
Inquiry required
Therefore, the details currently being released by the State Bank raise various doubts and questions. This is because the State Bank does not consistently adhere to the reservation norms. The Tamil Nadu Right to Life Party has accused the State Bank of India of creating chaos in the reservation system. Therefore, the State Bank of India should respond to this matter. In addition, the Tamil Nadu Right to Life Party urges the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment to conduct a proper investigation into the State Bank’s reservation violation and establish social justice. Thus Panruti The. Velmurugan MLA Said.
Supreme Court case
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Nadu General Secretary Ravi Kumar MP Wrote on their social media pages: EWS reservation blatant fraud. It shifts reservation from a caste-based social problem to an income-based economic problem. It must be abolished. The cut off of EWS reservation in State Bank of India exam is low. That fact must be taken into account. “Various political parties and individuals, including Vizika, have brought more than 40 cases against the EWS reserve, which are pending in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court must now come forward to hear these cases. The Tamil Nadu government must choose not to. participate in that and ask the Supreme Court to investigate.
Is this social justice?
The statistics for Tamil Nadu in the SBI exam only indicate that the candidates in the EWS Quota got lower marks. What does it show that the cut off marks (61.25) of OBC and General categories are the same as the cut off marks (61.25) of SC category? While the cut-off difference between SC and OBC is 11.50% in Uttar Pradesh and 10.25% in Madhya Pradesh, it is the same in Tamil Nadu! How can there be a single score on the cut off when there is a huge disparity in income between the SC segment and the OBC, General segment? Is this social justice? Thus Ravikumar MP. Has raised the question.
