The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has captured a partner of the imprisoned Wadhawan siblings in the DHFL bank extortion case. Ajay Nawander, a partner of previous advertisers of Diwan Housing Finance Ltd (DHFL), is supposed to be near some senior cops and was a source previously.
On July 8, the CBI led a look through the continuous examination concerning the case connected with the supposed loss of Rs 34,615 crore to a consortium of 17 banks, led by Union Bank of India, at the premises of two people in Mumbai and Dewan Villa, Mahabaleshwar, which prompted the recuperation of countless works of art and figures, a little money, and other implicating records.
One of the premises looked through in Mumbai had a place for Ajay Nawander and the other in Mahabaleshwar was connected to Rebecca Diwan. The value of the craftsmanship seized from the two premises is assessed to be associated with Rs 40 crore, according to beginning appraisals.
During the examination, it was found that the advertisers, Kapil and Dhiraj Wadhawan, had supposedly redirected the assets and taken interests in different elements. It was additionally claimed that the advertisers had procured costly artistic creations and models worth about Rs 55 crore (approx) utilizing the redirected reserves.
The case was filed in response to an objection from Union Bank of India, Industrial Finance Branch, Mumbai, against a private (borrower) organisation based in Mumbai; its then CMD, then chief, and others, including a confidential individual, privately owned businesses, obscure public servant (s), and confidential people, on the grounds that the accused defrauded a consortium of 17 banks led by Union Bank of India to the tune of over Rs 34,615 crore (approximately) by redirecting credentials.
It was additionally claimed that different reviews led by other confidential review bookkeeping associations had distinguished numerous examples of the redirection of assets by the accused for individual advantages and distortion of books of records to cover and disguise questionable exchanges.
The reviews also identified a few instances where large value credits were given to such fabricated elements without the expected level of effort and security. Occasions of approval and dispensing of credits only by email correspondence were purportedly found for which no advance records were kept up with in the said private (borrower) organization. Prior, a look was directed on June 22, 2024, at 12 areas in Mumbai at the premises of the blamed, which prompted the recuperation for implicating reports.
